India-Pakistan relations 2025: Legal conflict (Kashmir barbed wire, ICJ documents) vs cultural unity (Sufi shrine, cricket match) divided by Indus River - Symbolic illustration

Legal relations between India and Pakistan remain strained but are not non-existent. From the Indus Waters Treaty to ICJ adjudications, law has at times offered a peaceful avenue for resolution. However, the lack of trust and political will often hampers legal cooperation. A revival of legal diplomacy, rooted in mutual respect and compliance with international norms, could pave the way toward a more stable bilateral relationship. For meaningful progress, both nations must balance sovereignty concerns with pragmatic legal engagement. India and Pakistan may be divided by borders and politics, but they remain united by the intangible threads of culture and human values. The soul of the subcontinent thrives in shared poetry, music, spirituality, and a common ethos of humanity. Reawakening this spirit can pave the way for not just better relations but a profound re-imagination of what it means to be South Asian in the 21st century. As borders harden, culture offers a bridge—and it is through the lens of human values that lasting peace and mutual respect can emerge.

 Keywords: India-Pakistan relations, international law, Indus Waters Treaty, Kashmir dispute, bilateral agreements, ICJ, cross-border terrorism, LoC, ceasefire agreements, SAARC.

 1. Introduction India and Pakistan’s bilateral family members are shaped busing shared history, spiritual divide, and a Legacy of conflict. While diplomatic efforts and global mediation have every now and then helped ease tensions, legal mechanisms each bilateral and international have played a crucial but underappreciated function. This paper seeks to explore the prison dimensions of India-Pakistan members of the family, consisting of treaties, arbitration, court docket instances, and compliance with worldwide norms.


India and Pakistan, in spite of being divided through a turbulent records and political contention, percentage a deeply interconnected cultural and civilization legacy. Born from the identical soil, their humans showcase striking similarities in language, meals, music, get dressed, and—possibly most importantly—middle human values including hospitality, recognize for elders, circle of relatives bonds, and spirituality. This text explores the rich cultural connections and commonplace human value attitudes between Indians and Pakistanis, highlighting how shared historical past keeps to steer human beings-to-people members of the family within the face of political discord.


2. Historical Historical past
The partition of British India in 1947 ended in two sovereign nations: India and Pakistan. The Radcliffe Line, unexpectedly drawn, have become the basis in their territorial demarcation but left numerous areas disputed, considerably Kashmir. The ensuing violence and migration sowed seeds of distrust which have plagued members of the family ever in view that.
The early felony relationship become ruled by means of the Standstill settlement (1947) and subsequent attempts at resolving border and refugee problems. However, unresolved questions concerning Kashmir, water rights, and minority protections quickly escalated into felony and military confrontations.


3. Criminal Treaties and Agreements
3.1 the Liaquat–Nehru p.c. (1950) 

This settlement changed into aimed at the protection of spiritual minorities in both nations. It supplied for refugee resettlement, protection of belongings, and non-interference in internal subjects concerning minorities.
Importance: Early try and use felony international relations for human rights protections. 


3.2 The Indus Waters Treaty (1960)
Brokered by way of the sector bank, this treaty divided the six rivers of the Indus basin among the two nations. India changed into given control over the Jap Rivers (Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej), even as Pakistan acquired rights over the western rivers (Indus, Chenab, and Jhelum).Criminal Framework: Treaty signed below worldwide law, with an everlasting Indus fee hooked up.
Recent issues: India’s production of hydroelectric tasks has led to legal challenges by Pakistan. 


3.3 Tashkent settlement (1966)
After the 1965 Indo-Pak war, the Tashkent settlement turned into signed beneath Soviet mediation to repair peace. It devoted both aspects to withdraw forces and clear up disputes bilaterally.
3.4 Shimla settlement (1972) 

Following the 1971 war and introduction of Bangladesh, this settlement emphasized:
nonviolent resolution of disputes appreciate for the road of control (LoC). Bilateralism in managing all matters.
Legal Implication: India holds that the Shimla agreement bars third-birthday party intervention, a stance now not constantly everyday by way of Pakistan.

4. Disputes and worldwide prison Interventions
4.1 Kashmir Dispute
The most contentious problem, Kashmir has led to a couple of wars (1947-forty eight, 1965, 1999) and continues to be a point of armed skirmishes. Pakistan’s function: calls for internationalization of the dispute and implementation of UN resolutions. India’s function: Regards Kashmir as an internal rely and emphasizes bilateral decision under the Shimla settlement.
4.2 Kulbhushan Jadhav Case (2019) history: Indian national Kulbhushan Jadhav became arrested in Pakistan on expenses of espionage.
Prison Venue: international court of Justice (ICJ).
Verdict: ICJ dominated that Pakistan violated the Vienna convention on Consular members of the family by means of denying consular get admission to and ordered a review of the death sentence.
4.3 Sir Creek Dispute
this maritime boundary dispute within the Rann of Kutch has financial and protection implications.
Legal troubles: Differing interpretations of colonial-generation maps.
Present day fame: Stalemated, however periodic discussions continue below mounted felony channels. 


5 Criminal challenges in move-Border issues
5.1Terrorism and Non-nation Actors
India alleges Pakistan’s help for terror clothes beneath the doctrine of “potential deniability.”
Felony Stand: India argues Pakistan violates worldwide law via failing to save you non-kingdom actors from launching assaults, mentioning the worldwide regulation fee’s Articles on nation duty.
Instances: Mumbai 2008 and Pulwama 2019 assaults delivered worldwide interest to this difficulty.
5.2 Change and felony Retaliation
India revoked Pakistan’s maximum preferred kingdom (MFN) reputation after the Pulwama assault.
Criminal Implications: increases questions beneath WTO regulation and the South Asian loose trade agreement (SAFTA).

6. Prison Cooperation Mechanisms
Regardless of tensions, numerous boards and mechanisms exist: Joint Judicial Committee on Prisoners (2007): To cope with humanitarian issues of civilians and fishermen. Bilateral Visa Agreements: although often suspended, they provide a felony framework for humans-to-humans touch. Mutual prison help Treaties (MLATs): no longer yet comprehensive but proposed for precise regions like narcotics control.


7. Function of nearby and global our bodies


7.1 SAARC (South Asian association for local Cooperation)
although SAARC was supposed to foster local cooperation, India-Pakistan tensions have paralyzed its development.
Legal Standstill: The nineteenth SAARC Summit (2016) changed into canceled because of India’s withdrawal, mentioning go-border terrorism.
7.2 United international locations
The UN has traditionally intervened in Kashmir through resolutions and peacekeeping (UNMOGIP).
India’s View: restrained relevance publish-Shimla settlement.
Pakistan’s View: Advocates for greater UN intervention. 

8. Future Prospects and Legal Recommendations

 8.1 Confidence-Building Legal Measures Re-activating the compound Dialogue Process.
Legal cooperation on water- sharing, cybercrime, and counter-terrorism.
8.2 Institutionalizing disagreement Resolution Use of arbitration and third- party agreement under mutually agreed terms.
Bilateral bars for issues like Sir Creek.
8.3 Enhancing People to- People Legal Connections Regular exchanges between bar associations and law faculties.
Resumption of the Judicial Committee on captures.
Then’s a comprehensive composition on India- Pakistan Culture and Human Value station suitable for academic or reflective use


A Common Cultural Root
Before 1947, India and Pakistan were part of a single socio- political reality under British social rule. Regions like Punjab, Bengal, Sindh, and Rajasthan were centers of a compound culture that seamlessly integrated Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, and other communities. The Sufi- Bhakti movements, Mughal armature, classical music traditions, and participated myth illustrate this deeply intertwined artistic development.
1. Language and Literature
Urdu and Hindi partake a common verbal root in Hindustani. While they’ve diverged in script and vocabulary, they remain mutually comprehensible and are extensively understood across both countries. Pens like Faiz Ahmed Faiz, Gulzar, Amrita Pritam, and Saadat Hasan Manto reflect the participated anguish and stopgap post partition, frequently transcending public boundaries in their appeal.
2. Music and Cinema
From ghazals and qawwalis to Bollywood and Lollywood, both countries have contributed immensely to each other’s entertainment geographies.
Artists like Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and Lata Mangeshkar have entered admiration from both sides of the border. Common musical systems, similar as Coke Studio, have stressed the unifying power of art

Human Value stations A Shared Ethos
1 Family and Social Bonds Despite conflicts, the moral values cherished in both countries remain confirmed in analogous artistic and religious traditions
Respect for elders, near- knit extended families, and maternal authority are dominant values in both Indian and Pakistani societies. Marriage is considered a sacred social institution, with arranged marriages common in both.
2. Spirituality and Tolerance
India and Pakistan have deep spiritual traditions. Pakistan is home to Sufi saints like Data Ganj Bakhsh and Shah Abdul Latif, while India reveres Kabir, Guru Nanak, and Ramakrishna Paramhansa.These traditions emphasize love, forbearance, and humanity, frequently acting as a corrective to political or insular narratives.
3. Hospitality and liberality
The principle of “Atithi Devo Bhava” in India and “Mehmaan Nawaz” in Pakistan reflect a participated artistic emphasis on drinking guests with open hearts stories of people from both countries helping trippers or stranded citizens from the other side during natural disasters or extremities pullulate.

Cultural Diplomacy and People- to- People Contact


While formal tactfulness frequently remains simulated, people- to- people tactfulness has shown remarkable adaptability. Exemplifications of Cultural Bridge- Building man Ki Asha, a common action by The Times of India and Jang Group (Pakistan), aimed to foster peace through artistic and business exchanges. Visa-free pilgrimages have been allowed, similar as to Kartarpur Sahib in Pakistan and Ajmer Sharif in India. Cross-border marriages, though rare and complex, emblematize participated humanity and emotional ties that transcend borders.

Partition a Cultural and Human Tragedy
The trauma of Partition in 1947 continues to shape artistic memory and identity in both nations. Millions were displaced, and thousands were killed in collaborative violence. Yet, narratives of compassion, collective protection, and reunion also live. Numerous families in both countries still hold onto recollections, prints, and traditions of their ancestral homes across the border.
flicks like” Garam Hava”,” Pinjar”,” Earth”, and” Bajrangi Bhaijaan” deal sensitively with the mortal cost of partition and emphasize the significance of empathy and artistic durability.

Obstacles to Cultural Understanding
Despite participated values, several challenges hamper cross-border artistic appreciation Political propaganda and media sensationalism frequently paint the “other” as a perpetual adversary. Suppression and bans on flicks, artists, and sporting engagements circumscribe the natural inflow of artistic expression. Religious nationalism has decreasingly tried to define artistic identity in exclusionary terms.
The Way Forward Reclaiming Shared Humanity to make lasting peace, both countries must work their common artistic heritage and mortal value systems Educational Exchange Encouraging pupil exchange programs, history reformation, and common exploration in artistic studies. Media Collaboration Platforms for cooperative liar, pictures, and art that highlight parallels rather than differences. Civil Society Engagement NGOs, peace activists, and artists can play a pivotal part in keeping the artistic discussion alive. Digital Dialogue In the age of social media, youthful Indians and Pakistanis are decreasingly connecting to bandy music, fashion, and history — these exchanges need institutional support.


9. Conclusion
Legal relations between India and Pakistan remain simulated but are not missing. From the Indus Waters Treaty to ICJ adjudications, law has at times offered a peaceful avenue for resolution. Still, the lack of trust and political will frequently hampers legal cooperation. A reanimation of legal tactfulness, embedded in collective respect and compliance with transnational morals, could pave the way toward a more stable bilateral relationship. For meaningful progress, both nations must balance sovereignty enterprises with realistic legal engagement.
India and Pakistan may be divided by borders and politics, but they remain united by the impalpable vestments of culture and mortal values. The soul of the key thrives in participated poetry, music, church, and a common morality of humanity. Provoking this spirit can pave the way for not just better relations but a profounder-imagination of what it means to be South Asian in the 21st century.
As borders harden, culture offers a ground — and it’s through the lens of mortal values that lasting peace and collective respect can crop. 

References (Websites and Journals) 

World Bank. Indus Waters Treaty 1960.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/sar/brief/indus-waters-treaty Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Shimla Agreement (1972).
https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/5541/Simla+Agreement+July+2+1972 International Court of Justice. India v. Pakistan (Kulbhushan Jadhav).
https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/168 UN Security Council Resolutions on Counter-Terrorism
https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/counter-terrorism WTO. Trade Policy Reviews – India & Pakistan.
https://www.wto.org Save Indian Family Foundation.
https://www.saveindianfamily.org South Asia Analysis Group. Indo-Pak Relations.
http://www.southasiaanalysis.org LiveLaw.in – Legal updates on India-Pakistan disputes.
https://www.livelaw.in NUJS Law Review – Articles on international legal disputes.
https://nujslawreview.org Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies – Gender and legal issues in South Asia.
https://jsames.com 

Dr. Vidya Shaktawat (Professor)

Faculty of Law, Madhav University

By Madhav University

https://madhavuniversity.edu.in/